On the Particle Physics of Muon Particle Decay Explained by Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE)

Entropic Cost (EC), Entropic Accounting (EA), Entropic Resistance (ER), Entropic Throttling (ET), and Obidi's Loop — Part 1

In Obidi's radical Theory of Entropicity (ToE), nothing in the universe happens “for free.” Every physical change — motion, decay, vibration, reaction, or interaction — requires the entropic field to actively update and maintain the system. The Theory of Entropicity teaches that there is an Entropic Cost (EC) to every action and reaction — to every observation, measurement, interaction, and even to existence itself. Objects are not static things that simply persist; they are continuously reconstructed by entropy.

This immediately changes how we think about time, mass, and decay.

Muon Decay Through the Lens of ToE

A muon does not decay because “time passes.” It decays because a sequence of internal physical processes must occur: transitions, interactions, and rearrangements of the muon’s internal structure. These processes require entropic processing capacity. When a muon is at rest relative to the entropic field, almost all available capacity is devoted to its internal evolution, so decay proceeds at its normal rate.

When the muon moves at high speed, the situation changes fundamentally. Motion is not simply a label; it requires the entropic field to continually re-establish the muon’s existence at new locations. This re-establishment consumes entropic capacity. Because the total capacity is finite, what is used to sustain motion cannot be used to drive internal processes. As a result, the internal steps required for decay take longer to complete. The muon lives longer not because time itself slows, but because its internal physical processes are starved of entropic resources.

The experiment measures a longer lifetime, but what is really happening is a slower internal progression toward decay.

Mass Increase as Entropic Resistance

Mass, in ToE, is not a fixed intrinsic quantity. It is a measure of how much an object resists being changed — especially being accelerated. When an object moves slowly, only a small amount of entropic capacity is required to maintain its motion. Most of the capacity remains available to respond to forces, so the object accelerates easily.

As speed increases, more entropic capacity is consumed just to preserve coherence while moving. Less capacity remains available to respond to applied forces. When you push the object, the entropic field cannot reconfigure it as easily as before. This growing difficulty in changing the object’s state appears experimentally as increased inertia.

That is what relativistic mass increase really is in ToE: entropic resistance.

This is why muon decay slowdown and mass increase are not two separate effects. They are the same phenomenon viewed from different angles. In both cases, internal processes are competing with motion for limited entropic capacity. In one case, the consequence is slower decay. In the other, it is increased resistance to acceleration.

Einstein’s theory encodes these outcomes in spacetime geometry. It says clocks run slow and masses increase because of Lorentz transformations. Those statements are mathematically correct and experimentally successful. But they do not explain why motion affects physical processes.

ToE provides the missing causal explanation: motion consumes entropic capacity. What is consumed cannot be used internally. Everything that slows or resists does so for this reason.

Hence, muon decay slows because internal processes slow, and mass increases because resistance grows — both arising from the same entropic accounting constraint. Nothing mystical is happening to time or space. What changes is the availability of entropy to do physical work. This is the Entropic Resistance Principle (ERP) of ToE.

Supplementary Notes 1

Obidi’s Theory of Entropicity (ToE) asserts that existence itself is not free. Every action and reaction, every observation, measurement, interaction, and even the continued persistence of a physical system carries an unavoidable Entropic Cost (EC).

This cost is not a secondary statistical artifact, but a fundamental physical requirement imposed by the finite update capacity of the entropic field. In ToE, nothing happens instantaneously or without expenditure: to exist, to move, to interact, or to be observed is to demand entropic processing. Reality advances only insofar as entropy can pay the cost of its own reconfiguration.

In the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), existence is an expenditure. There is an Entropic Cost to every action and reaction, to every observation and measurement, to every interaction and transformation. Even persistence itself must be continually paid for. Nothing in nature occurs without entropy doing work. Reality is not merely described by entropy — it is continuously financed by it.

Supplementary Notes 2

Entropic Cost, Entropic Throttling, and the Architecture of Reality

The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) begins from a radical but precise assertion: entropy is not a descriptor of physical processes; it is the process itself. Reality exists only insofar as entropy can continuously reorganize itself into stable and metastable patterns.

From this starting point arise three inseparable principles:

• Entropic Cost (EC)
• Entropic Throttling (ET)
• Entropic Accounting Principle (EAP)

Together, they form the operational engine of the universe.

Entropic Cost (EC) states that no physical occurrence is free. Every action, reaction, interaction, observation, or persistence of structure requires a nonzero expenditure of entropic capacity. Even “doing nothing” is not costless; maintaining identity across time demands continual entropic updating. Energy conservation describes how work is redistributed, but EC explains why work can occur at all.

From EC follows the Entropic Accounting Principle (EAP). The entropic field possesses a finite update capacity at every region of spacetime. This capacity must be allocated among competing demands: motion, internal dynamics, structural stability, interactions, and observations. If more entropic capacity is consumed by one demand, less is available for others. There is no hidden reserve and no bypass.

Entropic Throttling (ET) is the dynamical consequence of EC under finite capacity. When a system approaches the limits of the entropic field’s update rate, its internal processes slow — not because of force, geometry, or observer perspective, but because of insufficient entropic bandwidth. ET is the universe saying: this is all the entropy I can process right now.

This triad explains relativistic and quantum phenomena without paradox. Time dilation arises because internal clocks are throttled when entropic capacity is redirected to sustain motion. Length contraction reflects reduced spatial resolution under constrained entropic processing. Relativistic mass increase occurs because accelerating a system demands increasing entropic expenditure to preserve coherence against the resistance of the field.

Crucially, observation itself incurs Entropic Cost. Measurement is not passive; it is an entropic transaction. This is why ToE asserts that no two observers can resolve the same event at the same instant: the entropic field cannot process multiple independent resolutions simultaneously. One resolution must occur first — even if no experiment can reveal which.

Entropic Cost sets the price of existence. Entropic Accounting allocates the budget. Entropic Throttling enforces the limits. Together, they replace force, geometry, and probabilistic collapse with a single universal constraint: reality unfolds only as fast as entropy can afford to compute itself.

This is not an interpretation layered atop physics. It is a re-foundation beneath it.

Supplementary Notes 3

Entropic Cost (EC), Entropic Throttling (ET), Entropic Accounting (EAP), and Obidi's Loop (OL)

1. What Obidi’s Loop Actually Is (Precisely)

Obidi’s Loop is the closed feedback cycle by which the entropic field:

• Creates matter
• Limits motion
• Resists acceleration
• Throttles internal dynamics
• Feeds back into mass, time, and inertia

It is called a loop because there is no external driver. The universe updates itself using finite entropic capacity, and every update changes the future availability of that capacity. Nothing escapes the loop — not motion, not mass, not time, not observation.

2. Step-by-Step: The Unified Entropic Cycle (UEC)

Step 1: Entropy Creates Structure (Birth of Matter)

In ToE, a particle is not a point in spacetime; it is a stable, self-maintaining entropic pattern. Maintaining that pattern from one moment to the next requires continuous entropic updating. This is Entropic Cost (EC): existence itself costs entropy. No entropy → no persistence → no particle.

Step 2: Motion Requires Continuous Re-Resolution

When a particle moves, the entropic field must:

• Recompute its location
• Re-establish its coherence
• Maintain its identity against environmental fluctuations

This requires additional entropic expenditure, beyond what is needed merely to exist. This is the motion cost inside the Entropic Accounting Principle (EAP). The total entropic budget is finite, so more capacity spent on motion means less capacity available for internal processes.

Step 3: Entropic Throttling Slows Internal Processes

Internal dynamics (decay, oscillation, clocks, chemistry) run only as fast as entropic capacity allows. When motion consumes more of the budget, internal processes are throttled. This is Entropic Throttling (ET), which explains time dilation, slower decay rates (e.g., muons), and reduced internal evolution. No geometry is needed; no observer illusion is involved.

Step 4: Resistance to Acceleration (Origin of Mass Increase)

Acceleration demands even more entropic updates than uniform motion, because the pattern must be continuously re-stabilized against change. The entropic field resists this by requiring more entropy per unit acceleration and making further acceleration progressively harder. This resistance appears as inertial mass increase. This is Obidi’s Loop closing back on itself:

More speed → more entropic cost → less internal capacity → greater resistance → effective mass increase.

3. Why This Is a Loop (Not a Chain)

Motion increases entropic cost. Increased cost reduces internal capacity. Reduced capacity slows time and increases resistance. Increased resistance feeds back into how motion can occur. There is no linear cause-and-effect. Motion, mass, time, and inertia co-emerge through recursive entropic self-regulation. That recursion is Obidi’s Loop.

4. How This Replaces Einstein (Without Breaking Experiments)

Einstein explains relativistic effects by saying spacetime geometry changes and observers measure different intervals. ToE explains the same effects by saying entropic capacity is finite, motion reallocates entropic resources, and internal processes are throttled. Muon lifetime experiments, particle accelerators, and GPS clocks all measure outcomes, not mechanisms. Both theories predict the same quantitative results, but with different ontologies: Einstein says geometry changes; ToE says entropy reallocates.

5. Why This Does Not Violate Relativity or Quantum Mechanics

Obidi’s Loop does not introduce signals, does not define a preferred frame, and does not alter observable invariants. It operates beneath observability, as a constraint on what can be processed, not on what can be seen. Just as energy conservation limits dynamics without being directly observable, entropic capacity limits reality without announcing itself.

6. The Unified Picture of ToE’s Principles

Entropic Cost (EC) sets the price of existence, Entropic Accounting (EA/EAP) allocates the budget, Entropic Throttling (ET) enforces the limits, and Obidi’s Loop closes the cycle that makes mass, time, and inertia inevitable. This is why ToE is not a reinterpretation of physics; it is the operating system underneath all of physics — of nature and reality.

Addendum 1

1. What the Muon Experiment Actually Shows (No Interpretation Yet)

A muon at rest decays in about 2.2 microseconds. A muon moving near the speed of light survives much longer as measured by laboratory clocks. That is the raw empirical fact. The experiment does not measure spacetime curvature, coordinate transformations, or Minkowski geometry. It only measures how long the decay takes. Any theory must explain why decay slows down when the particle moves fast.

2. Einstein’s Explanation (What It Assumes)

Einstein explains this by saying the muon’s own clock runs slower because time itself dilates for moving objects. This explanation assumes that time is a coordinate, motion changes the structure of spacetime, and decay rates are governed by proper time. This works mathematically, but it does not explain what physically slows the decay. It tells you that the clock slows, not why.

3. What Decay Actually Is (Physically)

A muon decay is not “time flowing.” It is a physical process involving field interactions, internal transitions, and probability amplitudes changing. In plain language: a muon decays because its internal degrees of freedom evolve until a decay channel opens. That evolution requires physical updating.

4. The Core ToE Insight (The Missing Step)

ToE introduces one new physical statement: internal processes require entropic update capacity. This is not metaphorical. Any change in a physical system requires state resolution, consumes entropy flow, and uses finite updating capacity. There is no free evolution.

5. What Changes When the Muon Moves Fast

A fast-moving muon is not “just the same muon plus velocity.” It is a system that must be continuously re-localized, continuously re-cohered, and continuously updated relative to the entropic field. This costs entropy. So the entropic field must split its finite capacity between maintaining motion and maintaining internal evolution (including decay). This is not optional; there is no third place the entropy can come from.

6. Why Decay Slows Down (According to ToE)

When the muon is at rest, almost all entropic capacity goes into internal dynamics and decay proceeds at the normal rate. When the muon moves fast, a large fraction of capacity is consumed just to maintain motion, leaving less capacity for internal transitions. Therefore, internal evolution proceeds more slowly. Decay is delayed because the system literally cannot update itself internally as fast. Nothing mystical happens to time; nothing is stretched. The decay process is entropically throttled — hence Entropic Throttling (ET) in ToE.

7. Why This Matches the Experiment Exactly

Muon lifetime experiments measure decay rate relative to laboratory clocks. ToE predicts that decay rate is proportional to available internal entropic capacity. As velocity increases, available internal capacity decreases and decay rate slows by the same factor. The result is numerically identical to Einstein’s time dilation, but the cause is different.

8. Why This Is Not Just Wordplay

Einstein says: time slows, so decay slows. ToE says: decay slows, therefore time appears to slow. Time is no longer the cause; it is the accounting record. That is a reversal of explanation, not a restatement.

9. Why No Experiment Can Tell the Difference (Yet)

The experiment only sees how long the muon survives. Both theories predict the same survival curve. Neither experiment measures entropic capacity, update rates, or internal state resolution. So ToE survives existing tests by construction, while offering a deeper causal layer.

10. Summary of the ToE Explanation

In summary, Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE) teaches that a fast muon decays more slowly because maintaining its motion consumes entropic capacity that would otherwise drive its internal decay dynamics. If this statement were false, ToE would collapse.

How Obidi’s Loop Explains Both Mass Increase and Decay Suppression

Obidi’s Loop is the dynamical feedback cycle at the heart of ToE. It explains why motion, mass increase, and slowed internal dynamics are not separate effects, but manifestations of the same entropic constraint.

Here is the loop in words:

• A physical object exists only because the entropic field continually re-creates it.
• This re-creation is not passive; it requires finite entropic processing capacity.
• When the object is at rest, almost all of this capacity is used to maintain:
  • internal structure
  • internal transitions
  • internal reactions

When the object moves, the situation changes fundamentally. In ToE, motion is not “free.” Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE) teaches that there is Entropic Cost (EC) to all forms of motion in the universe. To remain a coherent object while moving relative to the entropic field, the object must be continually re-localized. That re-localization consumes entropic capacity.

Now the loop closes:

More motion → more entropic cost to maintain coherence → more cost → less capacity available internally → less internal capacity → slower internal processes → slower internal processes → increased resistance to acceleration and change.

That resistance is what we perceive as increased mass.

So in ToE:

• mass increase is not geometric,
• mass increase is not relativistic bookkeeping,
• mass increase is entropic back-reaction.

Decay suppression (like muon lifetime increase) and relativistic mass increase are the same phenomenon, seen from two sides:

• decay suppression: internal processes slow,
• mass increase: response to force weakens.

Obidi’s Loop unifies them.

Why Obidi's Theory Replaces Einstein’s Explanation (Without Contradicting It)

Einstein’s explanation relies on spacetime geometry:

• moving clocks run slow,
• lengths contract,
• masses increase because of Lorentz transformations.

This works mathematically, but it leaves a causal gap: why does motion change physical rates at all?

ToE replaces the explanation, not the predictions. In ToE:

• there is no need to assume spacetime itself changes,
• there is no need to say “time dilates,”
• there is no need to invoke geometric transformation as cause.

Instead, Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE) says:

• All physical change requires entropic updating.
• The entropic field has finite capacity.
• Motion consumes capacity.
• What is consumed cannot be used elsewhere.

Time dilation, length contraction, and mass increase are not primary effects. They are secondary bookkeeping consequences of entropic accounting. Einstein describes how measurements relate. ToE explains why the relations exist at all.

Thus, ToE does not compete with Einstein at the level of predictions; it replaces the ontology beneath Einstein’s mathematics.

Why This Does Not Break Any Experiment

This is crucial. Every experiment in special relativity measures:

• decay rates,
• clock rates,
• momentum vs acceleration,
• energy vs velocity.

None of them directly measure:

• spacetime geometry itself,
• entropic capacity,
• internal update budgets.

ToE reproduces:

• the same decay curves,
• the same velocity–energy relations,
• the same inertial resistance,
• the same light-speed limit.

The numerical outcomes depend only on how much internal dynamics are suppressed, not on why they are suppressed. Einstein attributes suppression to geometry. ToE attributes suppression to entropic resource allocation. Experiments cannot distinguish between “time slowed” and “process slowed” — they only see the outcome. That is why ToE does not break experiments, and also why it is harder to falsify.

The Deep Payoff (Why This Matters)

ToE achieves something Einstein’s framework cannot:

• It explains what time really is: the rate of internal entropic updating.
• It explains what mass really is: resistance caused by entropic load.
• It explains why motion has a universal speed limit: finite update capacity.
• It explains why decay slows: entropic starvation, not time distortion.

This is not a reinterpretation. It is a causal re-grounding.

One final clarity sentence: Muon lifetime experiments do not prove that time slows. They prove that internal physical processes slow under motion. Einstein encoded that fact geometrically. The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) explains it physically.

Appendix: Extra Matter 2

Entropic Accounting Principle (EAP) and Entropic Resistance Principle (ERP)

The Entropic Accounting Principle (EAP) is a proposed concept within John Onimisi Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE), an emerging framework in theoretical physics that posits entropy as a fundamental, dynamic field of reality. The EAP, often mentioned in conjunction with the Entropic Resistance Principle (ERP), is used to explain relativistic effects like mass increase, time dilation, and length contraction not as kinematic postulates (as in Einstein's relativity), but as “entropic inevitabilities” arising from the conservation and redistribution of this fundamental entropic field.

Core Concepts of the Entropic Accounting Principle

The EAP essentially acts as a universal balance sheet for entropy, ensuring that the total “entropic budget” of a system or process remains consistent across different inertial frames of reference.

• Entropic Conservation: In a closed system (or across a full physical cycle), the total amount of entropy or entropic action must be conserved or invariant, regardless of the observer's motion.
• Redistribution of Entropy: When a system moves at high velocity, its entropy density increases. To maintain the overall entropic invariant as mandated by the EAP, other properties of the system must adjust. This forced adjustment is what physically causes length contraction and time dilation.
• Derivation of the Lorentz Factor: The EAP, combined with the “No-Rush Theorem” (which states interactions take a finite time and cannot exceed the speed of light), mathematically derives the relativistic Lorentz factor. This provides a physical mechanism for why the speed of light appears constant to all observers — their measuring tools (clocks and rulers) are physically altered by their motion through the entropic field in a way that guarantees this result.

In essence, the EAP shifts the focus from geometric laws of spacetime to a physical conservation law of a fundamental entropic field, providing a causal explanation for phenomena that are merely postulated in conventional relativity.

Appendix: Extra Matter 3

1. Does Entropy “Recompute” When an Object Moves?

Yes — but not arbitrarily, and not because motion is special by itself. In the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), existence is not passive. A particle or object is not a static thing sitting in spacetime; it is a continuously maintained entropic pattern.

Why must it be maintained? Because the universe, in ToE, does not store states — it only stores constraints. At every fundamental instant, the entropic field must answer a single question: “Given all constraints, what patterns may persist next?”

When an object is at rest relative to its environment (the entropic field), the constraints are minimal. When an object moves, the constraints change. Motion means:

• new relational information,
• new boundary conditions,
• new correlations with surrounding entropy.

That forces an update — not because motion is “detected,” but because relations have changed. So entropy “recomputes” only in the sense that the allowed continuation of the pattern must be re-validated.

2. Why Must Relations Be Re-Validated?

Because identity in ToE is relational, not intrinsic. A particle is defined by:

• what it is correlated with,
• what it excludes,
• what it can exchange entropy with.

When it moves:

• its neighborhood changes,
• its interaction horizon shifts,
• its future constraints differ from its past constraints.

If those changes were ignored, the object would not be the same object. So the entropic field must rebind the pattern, reassert coherence, and prevent decoherence or dissolution. This is not optional; it is the price of persistence.

3. Is This “Recomputation” Observable?

No — and this is essential. Just as you cannot observe:

• the updating of the Schrödinger equation itself,
• the conservation bookkeeping of energy,
• the renormalization flow in quantum field theory,

you cannot observe entropic updates directly. You only observe:

• slower clocks,
• increased inertia,
• delayed decay,
• resistance to acceleration.

Those are symptoms, not the mechanism.

4. What Happens If Entropy Cannot “Hold” the Internal Processes Together?

Here we must be precise. The object does not suddenly vanish like magic. Instead, one of three outcomes occurs depending on context:

Case 1: Gradual Entropic Throttling (Most Common)

Internal processes slow:

• Decay is delayed
• Oscillations stretch
• Reaction rates drop

This is observed in:

• Muon lifetime dilation
• Time dilation generally

The pattern survives, but evolves more slowly.

Case 2: Structural Reconfiguration

If the entropic field cannot maintain the current structure, it may:

• Transition the system into a different stable pattern
• Redistribute entropy internally
• Change effective mass or coupling

This resembles:

• Phase transitions
• Particle state changes
• Energy redistribution

Still no disappearance.

Case 3: Loss of Coherence (True Dissolution)

Only if entropic support drops below the minimum needed for identity does the pattern fail.

• The object does not “vanish.”
• It ceases to be a coherent object.
• Its entropy is absorbed into the surrounding field.

This is not annihilation — it is de-patterning. The universe does not destroy; it reassigns entropy.

5. Why Doesn’t This Happen All the Time?

Because ordinary conditions rarely exceed entropic capacity. The entropic field is enormously robust. Only extreme conditions push systems toward dissolution:

• Near light speed
• Extreme acceleration
• Black hole horizons
• High-energy collisions

Under everyday motion, the system is safely throttled, not destroyed.

6. The Deep Principle (This Is the Core)

Objects do not persist because they exist. They exist because they can still be afforded by the entropic budget of reality.

Motion raises the cost. Entropy pays the bill. When the bill is too high, something must give.

That “something” may be:

• Speed
• Internal rate
• Structure
• Or, in the extreme, identity itself

7. Final Clarity on Entropic Computation

• Yes, entropy must update when relations change, including motion.
• No, objects do not vanish simply because entropy is busy.
• Yes, internal processes slow when entropic capacity is reallocated.
• Only in extreme limits does identity itself fail.

This is not mystical — it is accounting. Reality, in ToE, is a system that never overdrafts entropy without incurring its due cost.

This expresses a central philosophical tenet of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE): existence is dynamic, not static. Physical entities are not passive occupants of spacetime but actively sustained, self-maintaining entropic configurations.

This shifts the focus from matter as a fundamental substance to matter as an emergent, information-based, inherently dynamic process.

From “Being” to “Doing”

In ToE, existence is not passive. An object is more like a standing wave or a whirlpool than a billiard ball — it only “exists” as long as the underlying entropic flux maintains that configuration.

Under this framework, matter is essentially a high-frequency entropic process. If the maintenance of that pattern drops below a threshold, the object dissolves back into the ambient field.

This suggests that mass may be a measurement of the “effort” or entropic density required to keep a pattern stable against the natural drive toward maximum entropy.

Alignment with Modern Physics

• Dissipative Structures: systems that maintain order by exporting entropy.
• Process Philosophy: relations and changes are more fundamental than substances.
• Quantum Field Theory: particles as excitations of underlying fields.

Implications for Causality and Time

Viewing objects as sustained entropic events changes how we think about causality and time. It raises natural questions about:

• the arrow of time,
• gravitational attraction as an entropic gradient,
• and the nature of persistence itself.

Why This Insight Feels Profound

Most physics assumes: objects exist first, and laws describe what they do.

ToE inverts this: laws exist first, and objects are what survive the laws.

This inversion marks a genuine conceptual shift.

What ToE Quietly Removes

• Persistence is free: ToE says persistence has a cost.
• Motion is kinematic: ToE says motion changes the burden of existence.
• Time flows independently: ToE says time is the rate at which entropy can afford updates.

Once seen, this cannot be unseen.

Why This Was Not Obvious Before

• Geometry is mathematically seductive.
• Entropy was treated as statistical, not ontological.
• Variational principles were tied to energy, not informational capacity.

It took information geometry, thermodynamic computation, and quantum foundations to make this question even askable. ToE asks it directly.

Why ToE Does Not Collapse into Metaphysics

ToE is not saying vague things like:

• “Reality is information.”
• “Everything is entropy.”

It says something sharper: Reality is a constrained update process.

This is a physical claim, testable indirectly through:

• Rate limits
• Lifetime dilation
• Inertial resistance
• Information bottlenecks

Why ToE’s Instinct Matters

Many defend old frameworks reflexively. ToE does not. It follows the logic to its conclusion and asks:

“Then why doesn’t everything vanish?”

This is the right question. It shows ToE thinks structurally, not defensively.

The Unsettling but Beautiful Takeaway

In the Theory of Entropicity (ToE): Existence is not guaranteed; it is continuously negotiated.

Not by observers. Not by spacetime. But by entropy itself.

This idea is not merely clever — it is dangerous to old theories, and that is why it feels profound.

References

1. On the Particle Physics of Muon Particle Decay Explained by Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE): Entropic Cost (EC), Entropic Accounting (EA), Entropic Resistance (ER), Entropic Throttling (ET) and Obidi's Loop in ToE — Part 1
2. Summary Note On the Particle Physics of Muon Particle Decay Explained by Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE): Entropic Cost (EC), Entropic Accounting (EA), Entropic Resistance (ER), Entropic Throttling (ET) and Obidi's Loop in ToE — Part 2

Source link: https://theoryofentropicity.blogspot.com/