Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
Monograph Chapter Notes
Derivations - Derivations in the ToE
Visit:
- Ontodynamics
- Postulates
- Foundations - Muon Particle Decay and Expositions of ToE
- Curvature Invariant and Metrics
- Derivations
Supporting Role of the Amari–Čencov Alpha‑Connections in the Derivation of Einstein’s Relativistic Kinematics from Obidi’s Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
In the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), the Amari–Čencov \( \alpha \)-connection does not directly derive relativistic effects. Instead, it provides the geometric framework within which entropic geodesics manifest those effects as emergent consequences of finite entropy propagation along \( \alpha \)-deformed paths.[2][3]
Primary Mechanism: Entropic Resistance + No‑Rush Theorem
Relativistic effects (Lorentz factor, time dilation, length contraction) arise from three core entropic principles, independent of the \( \alpha \)-connection:
- Entropic Resistance Principle (ERP): Moving systems face resistance to spatial entropy redistribution, forcing compensatory temporal entropy buildup.
- Entropic Accounting Principle (EAP): The total entropy budget \( S_0 = S_t(v) + S_x(v) \) is conserved, yielding the Lorentz factor \( \gamma(v) = 1/\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2} \).
- No‑Rush Theorem: \( c \) is the maximum rate of entropic rearrangement, imposing causal bounds.
These principles reproduce Einstein’s transformations without geometric postulates. [2][1]
The α‑Connection’s Supporting Role
The \( \alpha \)-connection governs the trajectories of entropic configurations \( \theta^i(\lambda) \) through the information manifold:
Key Contributions
- \( \alpha = 0 \) limit: Fisher–Rao (Levi–Civita) geodesics recover classical entropic paths where resistance effects produce the Lorentz factor.
- \( \alpha \neq 0 \) deformations: Rényi/Tsallis entropies \( \alpha = 2(1 - q) \) modify path curvature, but the underlying \( S_0 \)-conservation and \( c \)-bound remain universal.
- Quantum regime (\( \alpha \to 1 \), Fubini–Study): Entropic wavefunctions follow projective geodesics, with relativistic effects encoded in phase‑evolution constraints.
How Geometry and Relativistic Behavior Emerge in ToE
Entropic field S(x) → Information manifold (θᶦ)
↓ [α‑connection governs paths]
Entropic geodesics θᶦ(λ) → Emergent spacetime metric g_μν[S]
↓ [No‑Rush + Resistance along paths]
Lorentz invariance + γ(v) as entropic inevitabilities
The \( \alpha \)-connection ensures path consistency across classical and quantum regimes, while entropic budget conservation (independent of the connection) enforces relativistic kinematics along those paths.[2][3][1]
Bottom line: The \( \alpha \)-connection provides the rails; entropic resistance provides the relativistic physics.
Citations
- [1] ToE Derives Einstein’s Relativistic Speed of Light
- [2] ToE Derives and Explains Mass Increase
- [3] Alternative Path Toward Quantum Gravity
- [4] Relativistic Dynamics
- [5] Feynman Lectures: Space‑Time
- [6] Quantum Physics: Theory of Everything
- [7] Einstein Connection of the Unified Theory of Relativity
- [8] α‑Connections in Generalized Geometry
Derivation of the ToE Curvature Invariant ln 2
1. Entropy as a Physical Field
In the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), entropy \( S(x) \) is not a statistical quantity but a continuous physical field permeating spacetime. Information corresponds to a localized curvature or deformation of this field. Each configuration of information is described by an entropic density \( \rho(x) \) defined over a region \( \Omega \) of the entropic manifold, satisfying:
Two informational configurations are distinguishable only if their entropic curvature profiles differ by a finite geometric gap.
2. Distinguishability as Relative Entropic Curvature
ToE defines the measure of distinguishability between two entropic configurations \( \rho_A(x) \) and \( \rho_B(x) \) through the relative entropic curvature functional:
This functional, formally similar to the Kullback–Leibler divergence, is interpreted geometrically as the integrated curvature deformation required to transform one entropic configuration into another. It is non‑negative and invariant under smooth coordinate transformations of the informational manifold.
3. The Binary Curvature Symmetry of the Entropic Field
The simplest stable entropic distinction is binary: a localized region of the field can exist in two minimally distinct configurations, A and B, related by a curvature ratio of 2{:}1. Within their overlap:
This represents the smallest nontrivial deformation of the entropic field capable of supporting two distinct information‑bearing states.
4. Computing the Minimum Entropic Curvature Gap
Substituting the binary relation into the distinguishability functional gives:
Since \( \int_{\Omega} \rho_A(x)\, dV = 1 \), we obtain:
Thus, the smallest nonzero curvature separation between two distinguishable entropic configurations has magnitude:
5. Conversion from Curvature to Physical Entropy
In ToE, Boltzmann’s constant \( k_B \) acts as the universal conversion factor between the dimensionless curvature measure \( D \) and physical entropy \( S \). Hence, the minimal entropy change associated with the smallest distinguishable entropic deformation is:
6. Geometric and Physical Interpretation
Equation \( \Delta S_{\min} = k_B \ln 2 \) implies:
- The smallest distinguishable entropic curvature difference corresponds to a binary curvature gap of \( \ln 2 \).
- The quantity \( k_B \ln 2 \) is therefore the fundamental unit of entropic curvature in nature.
- Information is geometric: each bit corresponds to a curvature transition \( \rho_A \leftrightarrow \rho_B \) with ratio \( 2{:}1 \).
7. Operator‑Valued Generalization
At the spectral level, ToE reformulates this using the Araki relative entropy:
For the binary deformation \( \hat{\rho}_B = 2 \hat{\rho}_A \):
8. The ToE Curvature Invariant as Fundamental
In summary, the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) identifies \( \ln 2 \) as the minimal curvature invariant of the entropic manifold:
The factor \( \ln 2 \) quantifies the smallest possible geometric deformation between two distinguishable entropic field configurations. This derivation is independent of microstate counting, thermodynamic equilibrium, or probabilistic assumptions. It arises purely from the geometric structure of the entropic field and its binary curvature symmetry, marking a fundamental departure from classical and quantum statistical mechanics.
Originality of Obidi’s Derivation of the \( \ln 2 \) Curvature Invariant
In the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), the measure of distinguishability between two entropic configurations \( S(x) \) and \( S_0(x) \) is defined through the relative entropic curvature functional:
Although formally similar to the Kullback–Leibler divergence, ToE assigns this functional a geometric meaning: it represents the integrated curvature deformation required to transform one entropic configuration into another. It is non‑negative, vanishes only when \( S = S_0 \), and is invariant under smooth coordinate transformations of the informational manifold.
1. Reinterpreting KL‑Type Structure as Curvature
Classical information geometry treats KL divergence as a statistical measure of distinguishability. ToE makes a conceptual leap by treating the entropy field \( S(x) \) as a geometric object and interpreting the KL‑type density \( D(S,S_0) \) as a curvature deformation potential. This reinterpretation allows the functional to be inserted directly into the Obidi Action as a geometric potential term, something not done in standard physics.
2. Identifying the First Non‑Zero Minimum as a Physical Invariant
Evaluating the curvature potential for a binary 2:1 entropic ratio, \( S_0 = 2S \), yields the first non‑zero minimum:
ToE elevates this value to a geometric invariant, the Obidi Curvature Invariant (OCI), representing the smallest possible entropic curvature difference between physically distinguishable configurations. This step is original: ToE treats \( \ln 2 \) not as a statistical artifact but as a fundamental geometric threshold.
3. Embedding the Invariant into the Obidi Action
The curvature potential enters the Obidi / Spectral Obidi Action as:
Because the potential has a built‑in minimum at \( \ln 2 \), the entropy field cannot relax or distinguish configurations through arbitrarily small curvature changes. Instead, curvature responds in discrete increments, with \( \ln 2 \) acting as the quantum of entropic curvature. This is a structural innovation unique to ToE.
Summary: What ToE Contributes That Is New
- Reinterprets KL‑type distinguishability as a geometric curvature potential.
- Identifies the first non‑zero minimum of this potential (at a 2:1 ratio) as a physical curvature invariant.
- Embeds this invariant into the action, making \( \ln 2 \) the minimum distinguishable curvature gap in entropic dynamics.
Through these steps, ToE transforms the numerical constant \( \ln 2 \) from a statistical quantity into a fundamental geometric constant governing the structure and evolution of entropic reality.